Generated 2026-06-10T18:02:40.749Z · swipe each strip sideways · beat slides show the full 5-frame burst + mobile (purple border)
retirement-accounts
ship
solid · ~35 min · 7 beats · 0 console errors
- [blocker · D5] CARRIED-FORWARD BLOCKER — STILL NOT RESOLVED. The 1-1 ReadingCheck (slides.tsx lines 118-126) still marks 'Asha — the earlier start outruns the bigger contribution' correct for Asha $50/mo@18 vs Cyril $500/mo@30 at the module's own 7% monthly-compounded rate. Independently recomputed: Asha = $219,321, Cyril = $900,527. Cyril wins by ~4x. The answer marked correct is mathematically FALSE, and the contradiction is rendered ONE SLIDE LATER: the 02-f5 CompoundGrowthExplorer capture shows Asha $219,321 next to Cyril $901K, and the 1-2 ToolIntro ('watch which number wins') sharpens it. A 10x contribution ratio breaks the early-start claim. The prior fix was never applied. Note quiz q1 (Indira same-$300 framing) is already honest — mirror it. fix: Rewrite the 1-1 ReadingCheck to a SAME-contribution comparison ($300/mo at 18 vs at 30 — early start genuinely wins) OR drop Cyril to ~$80-100/mo so the early-start claim is true against the 7% the sim uses; then reframe the 1-2 ToolIntro honestly (Cyril's bigger checks buy the bigger bar, but look at the growth-vs-contributed share and what the delay cost per dollar). Mirror quiz q1's already-honest Indira framing. — RESOLVED 2026-06-10: EstimateReveal answer 1,000,000→450,000 with honest deposit-vs-compounding split; ReadingCheck rewritten to same-contribution comparison ($300/mo @18 vs @30 → ~$1.3M vs ~$540K) + the bigger-late-contribution caveat; math verified in node. Allocation lab widened max-w-3xl→5xl per width-utilization lens. ✓ resolved
- [should-fix · D5] CARRIED-FORWARD SHOULD-FIX — STILL NOT RESOLVED. EstimateReveal (slides.tsx lines 90-98) still answers $1,000,000 ('about a million dollars apart') for $200/mo @18 vs @28. At the module's stated 7% monthly-compounded rate the real gap is $457,977 ($877,286 vs $419,309) — the hook is ~2.2x inflated against the 7% the page then teaches in the very next section ('at 7% money roughly doubles every decade') and uses in every sim. Note the 01-full capture shows the EstimateReveal slider maxes at $1.5M with the $1M answer locked in. fix: Change the EstimateReveal answer to ~$450,000-$475,000 and adjust the explanation, or explicitly restate the rate that produces ~$1M (~9-10% nominal). Don't let the hook contradict the 7% used in every sim and reading on the page. — RESOLVED 2026-06-10: EstimateReveal answer 1,000,000→450,000 with honest deposit-vs-compounding split; ReadingCheck rewritten to same-contribution comparison ($300/mo @18 vs @30 → ~$1.3M vs ~$540K) + the bigger-late-contribution caveat; math verified in node. Allocation lab widened max-w-3xl→5xl per width-utilization lens. ✓ resolved
slide 9 BEAT — full burst
slide 10 f1 → f5 + mobile
slide 11 f1 → f5 + mobile
slide 12 f1 → f5 + mobile
slide 13 f1 → f5 + mobile
slide 14 f1 → f5 + mobile